Essay plan: opinion (agree or disagree)
A real IELTS Writing Task 2 question with the paragraph plan that fits it. Aim for 250 to 290 words in 40 minutes.
The question
In many countries, traditional family businesses are being replaced by large multinational corporations. What are the reasons for this, and do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Your 4-paragraph plan
- Introduction (40-50 words). Paraphrase the statement and give your clear opinion in one sentence.
- Body paragraph 1 (80-100 words). First reason you hold this view, with one specific example.
- Body paragraph 2 (80-100 words). Second reason, or address the strongest point on the other side and explain why your view still holds.
- Conclusion (40-50 words). Restate your opinion in fresh words and summarise your two reasons.
The trap in this question type
Examiners reward a clear position held from the first paragraph to the last. Do not sit on the fence, and do not switch sides halfway.
Model answer for this question
Written for this exact question in the official format. Read it once for ideas, then write your own before comparing.
Across many towns, small family shops that once sold groceries, hardware, or clothing have closed down, replaced by branches of international chains such as Walmart or IKEA. This shift has several clear causes, and while it brings some benefits, I believe it is largely a negative development for local communities.
One major reason for this change is economies of scale. Multinational corporations can buy stock in bulk, negotiate lower prices with suppliers, and use automated systems to cut labour costs, allowing them to sell goods more cheaply than a family-run shop ever could. A local bakery in my hometown, for instance, could not compete with a supermarket chain that sold bread at half the price by mass-producing it in a central factory. Additionally, globalisation and improved logistics mean that large companies can now easily enter new markets, backed by marketing budgets and brand recognition that small businesses lack. Consumers, often working with tight budgets, naturally gravitate toward the lower prices and consistent quality that big brands offer.
Despite the convenience this brings, I consider the trend harmful overall. Family businesses are frequently the backbone of local economies, keeping money circulating within the community rather than sending profits to distant shareholders. When a family-owned hardware store in my neighbourhood was replaced by a chain store, most of its former employees were replaced by fewer, part-time workers, and the owner's family, who had run the shop for three generations, lost both their income and their social role as trusted local figures. Furthermore, the loss of such businesses erodes the unique character of towns, as high streets across different countries increasingly look identical, filled with the same corporate logos.
In conclusion, although lower costs and efficient supply chains explain why multinational corporations are displacing family businesses, I believe this shift weakens local economies and cultural identity more than it benefits consumers. Governments should therefore consider supporting small businesses through tax incentives to preserve this balance.
Why this answer scores
- It takes a clear, consistent stance (negative development) and defends it throughout rather than sitting on the fence.
- Concrete, specific examples like the local bakery and hardware store replace vague generalisations and demonstrate the ideas convincingly.
- The essay is well-organised into distinct causes and evaluation paragraphs, with cohesive linking devices and a conclusion that adds a practical recommendation.