Essay plan: advantages and disadvantages

A real IELTS Writing Task 2 question with the paragraph plan that fits it. Aim for 250 to 290 words in 40 minutes.

The question

In many countries, employers increasingly use algorithms and automated systems to screen job applicants rather than relying on human judgement. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development?

Your 4-paragraph plan

  1. Introduction (40-50 words). Paraphrase the topic and say whether the benefits outweigh the drawbacks.
  2. Body paragraph 1 (80-100 words). The strongest advantage, developed with a concrete example.
  3. Body paragraph 2 (80-100 words). The main disadvantage, developed honestly, then weighed against the advantage.
  4. Conclusion (40-50 words). State your overall judgement: which side wins and why.

The trap in this question type

The question usually asks whether the advantages OUTWEIGH the disadvantages. Answer that comparison directly, not just a list of each.

Model answer for this question

Written for this exact question in the official format. Read it once for ideas, then write your own before comparing.

Automated screening tools now sift through thousands of resumes before a human recruiter ever sees them, a practice that brings clear efficiency gains but also raises serious concerns about fairness and accuracy. On balance, I believe the drawbacks of relying too heavily on algorithms outweigh their benefits unless they are carefully supervised by trained staff. The main advantage of automated screening is speed and consistency. A large company such as Amazon or Unilever may receive tens of thousands of applications for a single graduate scheme, and no team of recruiters could realistically read each one carefully. Software can quickly filter candidates based on keywords, qualifications, or test scores, allowing companies to shortlist applicants within hours rather than weeks. This also removes some forms of human inconsistency, such as a tired interviewer giving harsher marks late in the day than in the morning. However, these systems bring significant risks. Algorithms are trained on historical hiring data, which often reflects past biases. Amazon itself famously scrapped an internal recruiting tool after discovering it downgraded resumes containing the word "women's", because the training data came from a male-dominated industry. Such systems can therefore entrench discrimination rather than eliminate it, while appearing neutral and objective. Additionally, automated keyword matching often rejects strong candidates whose experience is described in unconventional language, such as career changers or those with international qualifications, even when they would perform the job well. A further disadvantage is the loss of nuanced human judgement. A hiring manager might recognise potential in a candidate whose passion and communication skills come through in an interview but not in a resume, whereas an algorithm cannot detect enthusiasm or cultural fit. Reducing hiring to numerical scores risks producing a workforce that is technically qualified but lacking in creativity or interpersonal strength. In conclusion, while automated screening offers undeniable efficiency for large-scale recruitment, its tendency to replicate bias and overlook human qualities means it should support, rather than replace, human decision-making in hiring.

Why this answer scores

  1. It takes a clear, consistent position (drawbacks outweigh benefits) and maintains it through to the conclusion.
  2. It uses specific, real-world evidence, such as the Amazon recruiting tool bias case, instead of vague generalisations.
  3. It is well organised into distinct advantage and disadvantage paragraphs with topic sentences and logical linking, meeting the band 8-9 coherence criteria.

Write it, then see your band in 60 seconds

Paste your essay into the checker and get scores for Task Response, Coherence, Vocabulary and Grammar, plus your three biggest fixes. Free to start.

Score my essay